- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-106/24, WEAREONE.WORLD BV: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie (Belgium) lodged on 8 February 2024 – OV v WEAREONE.WORLD BV
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0106
62024CN0106
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/3154
21.5.2024
(C/2024/3154)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: OV
Defendant: WEAREONE.WORLD BV
Question referred
Should Article 1(1) of the Rome Convention and Article 1(1) of the Rome I Regulation be interpreted as meaning that the question of ownership of copyright in a work created in performance of an obligation under an employment or commission contract, that is, the question of who is the original owner and whether and to what extent that right is transferable to a subsequent owner, is covered by the concept of ‘contractual obligations’?
—
Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations opened for signature in Rome on 19 June 1980 and approved by the [Belgian] Law of 14 July 1987.
Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (OJ 2008 L 177, p. 6).
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3154/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
Language of the case: Dutch.