- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-143/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri and PT Permata Hijau Palm Oleo v Commission (Subsidies — Imports of biodiesel originating in Indonesia — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2092 — Definitive countervailing duty — Article 8(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 — Price undercutting — Price pressure — Article 8(5) of Regulation 2016/1037 — Causal link — Article 3(1)(a)(iv) and (2) of Regulation 2016/1037 — Action consisting in ‘entrusting’ or ‘directing’ a private body to carry out a function constituting a financial contribution — Less than adequate remuneration — Income or price support — Article 3(2) and Article 6(d) of Regulation 2016/1037 — Benefit — Article 3(1)(a)(i) and (2) of Regulation 2016/1037 — Direct transfer of funds — Article 7 of Regulation 2016/1037 — Calculation of the amount of the benefit — Article 8(1) and (8) of Regulation 2016/1037 — Threat of material injury — Rights of the defence)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0143
62020TA0143
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 63/33
(Case T-143/20) (*)
(Subsidies - Imports of biodiesel originating in Indonesia - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2092 - Definitive countervailing duty - Article 8(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 - Price undercutting - Price pressure - Article 8(5) of Regulation 2016/1037 - Causal link - Article 3(1)(a)(iv) and (2) of Regulation 2016/1037 - Action consisting in ‘entrusting’ or ‘directing’ a private body to carry out a function constituting a financial contribution - Less than adequate remuneration - Income or price support - Article 3(2) and Article 6(d) of Regulation 2016/1037 - Benefit - Article 3(1)(a)(i) and (2) of Regulation 2016/1037 - Direct transfer of funds - Article 7 of Regulation 2016/1037 - Calculation of the amount of the benefit - Article 8(1) and (8) of Regulation 2016/1037 - Threat of material injury - Rights of the defence)
(2023/C 63/40)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri (Medan, Indonesia), PT Permata Hijau Palm Oleo (Medan) (represented by: F. Graafsma, J. Cornelis and E. Rogiest, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Kienapfel, G. Luengo and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: European Biodiesel Board (EBB) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M.-S. Dibling and L. Amiel, lawyers)
Re:
By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2092 of 28 November 2019 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of biodiesel originating in Indonesia (OJ 2019 L 317, p. 42), in so far as that regulation concerns them.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri and PT Permata Hijau Palm Oleo to pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: English.
ECLI:EU:C:2025:140
15