- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-551/22: Action brought on 5 September 2022 — QY v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0551
62022TN0551
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
7.11.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 424/39
(Case T-551/22)
(2022/C 424/50)
Language of the case: Portuguese
Parties
Applicant: QY (represented by: S. Gemas Donário and S. Soares, advogadas)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final, of 4 December 2020, on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal in favour of the Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III (Madeira Free Zone — Scheme III);
—order the Commission to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law.
1.The first plea in law relates to the fulfilment of the requirements for the compatibility of the Zona Franca da Madeira — Regime III, namely the source of the earnings and the creation and maintenance of jobs in the region.
2.The second plea in law relates to the allegedly unjustified delay in the Commission’s response.
3.The third plea in law relates to the alleged failure to comply with the obligation to state reasons.
4.The fourth plea in law relates to the right to a fair hearing.
5.The fifth plea in law relates to the protection of legitimate expectations.
6.The sixth plea in law relates to the principle of legal certainty.