I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2012/C 138/81)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: ZZ (represented by: L. Levi, M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)
Defendants: European Commission and European Police College
The annulment of the decisions rejecting the applicant’s demand to be granted the dependent child and education allowances for his wife's three children for the period in which they were still living in the Philippines.
—The annulment of the implicit decision of 25th March 2011 and of the explicit decision adopted by PMO on 11th July 2011, confirmed by the decision of 9th November 2011 rejecting the complaint, insofar as they reject the request of the applicant to be granted the dependent child and education allowances for his wife's three children for the period in which they were still living in the Philippines;
—as a consequence, the recognition of the applicant's entitlement to the said allowances;
—the compensation of the applicant's material prejudice consisting of retroactive payment of the dependent child and education allowances since 1st April 2009, provisionally evaluated at 33 673,31 euros, with late interest at the European Central Bank key rate plus two percentage points;
—the compensation of the applicant's moral prejudice evaluated at 20 000 euros;
—the order for the defending parties to pay the costs.