EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-22/12: Action brought on 17th February 2012 — ZZ v Commission and CEPOL

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012FN0022

62012FN0022

February 17, 2012
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/35

(Case F-22/12)

(2012/C 138/81)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: L. Levi, M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Defendants: European Commission and European Police College

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the decisions rejecting the applicant’s demand to be granted the dependent child and education allowances for his wife's three children for the period in which they were still living in the Philippines.

Form of order sought

The annulment of the implicit decision of 25th March 2011 and of the explicit decision adopted by PMO on 11th July 2011, confirmed by the decision of 9th November 2011 rejecting the complaint, insofar as they reject the request of the applicant to be granted the dependent child and education allowances for his wife's three children for the period in which they were still living in the Philippines;

as a consequence, the recognition of the applicant's entitlement to the said allowances;

the compensation of the applicant's material prejudice consisting of retroactive payment of the dependent child and education allowances since 1st April 2009, provisionally evaluated at 33 673,31 euros, with late interest at the European Central Bank key rate plus two percentage points;

the compensation of the applicant's moral prejudice evaluated at 20 000 euros;

the order for the defending parties to pay the costs.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia