I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-56/12 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - Competition - Abuse of dominant position - Ink cartridge market - Decision rejecting a complaint - Lack of Community interest - Low probability of proving the existence of an infringement of Article 82 EC - Degree of seriousness of the infringement alleged)
2013/C 344/33
Language of the case: German
Appellant: European Federation of Ink and Ink Cartridge Manufacturers (EFIM) (represented by: D. Ehle, Rechtanswalt)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Antoniadis and C. Hödlmayr, acting as Agents, and W. Berg, Rechtsanwalt), Lexmark International Technology SA
Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 November 2011 in Case T-296/09 EFIM v Commission by which the General Court dismissed an application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 4125 of 20 May 2009 rejecting complaint COMP/C-3/39.391 concerning alleged infringements of Articles 81 EC and 82 EC by Hewlett-Packard, Lexmark, Canon and Epson in the market for ink cartridges — Powers of the Commission — Obligations regarding the investigation of complaints — No Community interest — Proportionality — Failure to state reasons — Infringement of the rights of the defence — Commission Notice on the handling of complaints
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders European Federation of Ink and Ink Cartridge Manufacturers (EFIM) to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 118, 21.4.2012.