I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(C/2025/3923)
Language in which the application was lodged: Polish
Applicant: Grzegorz Chudy (Wręczyca Wielka, Poland) (represented by: A. Korbela, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Damian Peca (Częstochowa, Poland)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant
Design at issue: EU design (Graveside lights) – EU design No 8 465 249-0001
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 March 2025 in Case R 1330/2022-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision in so far as it upholds the appeal of the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, and dismiss the appeal in that regard;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 4(1), Article 6 and Article 25(1)(f) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 63(1) and (2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in the version in force on the date of adoption of the contested decision and in the version currently in force, as well as Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;
—Breach of the rule of law and infringement of the right to due process, as well as abuse of rights.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3923/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—