I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2022/C 148/53)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Homy Casa Ltd (Guangzhou, China) (represented by: J. Vogtmeier, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Albatros International GmbH (Nerdlen, Germany)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant
Design at issue: Community design (Chairs) — Community design No 2745 554-0002
Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 November 2021 in Case R 837/2020-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.
—Misapplication and misinterpretation of Article 25(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002, read in conjunction with Articles 4, 5, 6 and 7 thereof.