- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-336/22: Action brought on 7 June 2022 — PN v Court of Justice of the European Union
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0336
62022TN0336
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.7.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 284/55
(Case T-336/22)
(2022/C 284/75)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: PN (represented by: D. Giabbani, lawyer)
Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
—accept the present application as formally correct;
—find it materially justified and well-founded;
—by way of variation, declare that the assessment in the 2019 staff appraisal procedure be maintained, namely B in Ability, C in Efficiency and B in Conduct in the service;
—or, in the alternative, declare the 2019 appraisal procedure to be void.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging failure to give adequate reasons for the assessment of the applicant under each category.
2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the objective and spirit of the text of the General instructions on the preparation of staff reports.