EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-227/20: Action brought on 1 June 2020 — European Commission v Italian Republic

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CN0227

62020CN0227

June 1, 2020
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

3.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/13

(Case C-227/20)

(2020/C 255/16)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: R. Trico and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Italian Republic

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

declare that, by failing to adopt the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of Articles 4 and 7 of Regulation No 511/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on compliance measures for users from the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization in the Union, (1) by failing to adopt all the measures necessary to ensure that those rules are applied and that the penalties provided for are effective, proportionate and dissuasive, and by failing to notify the Commission of those rules on penalties by 11 June 2015, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 11 of Regulation No 511/2014;

order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission claims that the measures specifying penalties for infringement of Articles 4 and 7 of Regulation No 511/2014 have not yet been adopted by the Italian Republic, despite the fact that, first, those measures should have been laid down in the national legislation of the Member States since 11 June 2014 and, second, those measures should have been followed by the Member States implementing ‘all the measures necessary to ensure that they are applied’, as stated in the last sentence of Article 11(1) of Regulation No 511/2014.

Furthermore, the infringement of Article 11 of that regulation also concerns the Italian Republic’s failure to notify the Commission of the measures on penalties. In that regard, according to the final paragraph of Article 11 of Regulation No 511/2014, the Italian Republic was obliged to notify the Commission of the rules ‘referred to in paragraph 1’ of that provision, that is to say the ‘rules on penalties applicable to infringements of Articles 4 and 7’ by 11 June 2015.

(1) OJ 2014 L 150, p. 59.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia