I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-76/17) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Charges having an effect equivalent to customs duties - Article 30 TFEU - Internal taxation - Article 110 TFEU - Charge applied to exported petroleum products - Charge not passed on to the consumer - Tax burden for the taxpayer - Reimbursement of the sums paid by the taxpayer))
(2018/C 142/18)
Language of the case: Romanian
Applicants: SC Petrotel-Lukoil SA, Maria Magdalena Georgescu
Defendants: Ministerul Economiei, Ministerul Energiei, Ministerul Finanţelor Publice
EU law, in particular Article 30 TFEU, must be interpreted as meaning that the taxpayer, who in fact pays the charge having an equivalent effect contrary to that article, must be able to obtain reimbursement of the sums which it has paid by way of that charge, even in a situation where the payment mechanism for the charge has been designed in national legislation so that the charge is passed on to the consumer.
*
Language of the case: Romanian.