I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
2011/C 298/46
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Golden Balls Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Edenborough, QC, and S. Smith, Solicitor)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Intra-Presse (Boulogne-Billancourt, France)
—Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 22 June 2011 in case R 1432/2010-1, in so far as it held that the appeal before the Board of Appeal was successful in respect of certain goods and services in classes 9, 28 and 41; and
—Order the defendant to pay the applicant’s costs occasioned by this appeal, or alternatively, order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the applicant’s costs occasioned by this appeal.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘GOLDEN BALLS’ for goods and services in classes 9, 28 and 41 — Community trade mark application No 6036503
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 4226148 of the word mark ‘BALLON D’OR’, for amongst others goods and services in classes 9, 14, 16, 18, 25, 28, 38 and 41
Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the decision of the Opposition Division and partially accepted the opposition and the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal wrongly assumed that there is a perceived conflict between the Community trade mark application and the earlier mark.