- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-32/21: Action brought on 22 January 2021 — Daw v EUIPO (Muresko)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0032
62021TN0032
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
15.3.2021
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 88/37
(Case T-32/21)
(2021/C 88/50)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Daw SE (Ober-Ramstadt, Germany) (represented by: A. Haberl, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark Muresko — EU trade mark No 15 465 719
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 November 2020 in Case R 1686/2020-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to enter, in respect of the applicant’s EU trade mark No 15 465 719 Muresko, the seniority of the national marks PL No 108 756 (date of registration: 4 April 1996) and DE No 981 144 (day of registration: 24 February 1978);
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 39 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 40 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.