EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-136/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 3 May 2016 — Kovács v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Pensions — Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations — Pension rights acquired, prior to entering the service of the EU, under a national pension scheme — Transfer to the EU pension scheme — Initial proposal concerning the crediting of pensionable years made by the appointing authority and accepted by the person concerned — Withdrawal by the appointing authority of its initial proposal — New proposal concerning the crediting of pensionable years based on new general implementing provisions — Objection of inadmissibility — Concept of an act having adverse effect — Article 83 of the Rules of Procedure)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011FB0136

62011FB0136

May 3, 2016
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/40

(Case F-136/11) (*)

((Civil service - Officials - Pensions - Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Pension rights acquired, prior to entering the service of the EU, under a national pension scheme - Transfer to the EU pension scheme - Initial proposal concerning the crediting of pensionable years made by the appointing authority and accepted by the person concerned - Withdrawal by the appointing authority of its initial proposal - New proposal concerning the crediting of pensionable years based on new general implementing provisions - Objection of inadmissibility - Concept of an act having adverse effect - Article 83 of the Rules of Procedure))

(2016/C 222/51)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Zsuzsanna Kovács (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: initially, D. de Abreu Caldas, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal, S. Orlandi and J.-N. Louis, lawyers, then D. de Abreu Caldas, S. Orlandi, and J.-N. Louis, lawyers, and lastly, J.-N. Louis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, D. Martin and J. Baquero Cruz, Agents, then J. Currall and G. Gattinara, Agents, then G. Gattinara, Agent, and lastly, G. Gattinara and F. Simonetti, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision fixing the pension rights, acquired prior to entering the service, credited to the applicant under the EU pension scheme.

Operative part of the order

1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2.Zsuzsanna Kovács shall bear her own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

(*) Language of the case: French.

(1) OJ C 65, 3/3/2012, p. 24.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia