- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-78/18: Action brought on 6 February 2018 — European Commission v Hungary
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CN0078
62018CN0078
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-78/18)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Parties
Applicant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, L. Malferrari and K. Talabér-Ritz, acting as Agents)
Defendant: Hungary
Form of order sought
The Commission claims that the Court of Justice should:
—Declare that Hungary, by introducing discriminatorily, unnecessarily and without justification restrictions on foreign grants to Hungarian civil organisations through the a külföldről támogatott szervezetek átláthatóságáról szóló 2017. évi LXXVI. törvény (Law LXXVI of 2017, on the transparency of organisations that receive financial support from abroad), the provisions of which impose obligations of registration, declaration and transparency on certain categories of civil organisations—those that receive direct or indirect foreign financial support exceeding a specified amount —and also make it possible for penalties to be imposed on organisations that do not fulfil such obligations, has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 63 TFEU and Articles 7, 8 and 12 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
—Order Hungary to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Law LXXVI of 2017, on the transparency of organisations that receive financial support from abroad, imposes new obligations of registration, declaration, transparency and publicity on certain categories of civil organisations—those that receive direct or indirect foreign financial support exceeding a specified amount—and also makes it possible for penalties to be imposed on organisations that do not fulfil such obligations.
On 14 July 2017, the Commission initiated infringement proceedings against Hungary in relation to Law LXXVI of 2017.
Finding that the response provided by Hungary was unsatisfactory, the Commission moved to the next phase of infringement proceedings and, on 5 October 2017, sent Hungary a reasoned opinion.
Finding that the response to the reasoned opinion was not satisfactory either, the Commission decided to refer the case to Court of Justice for a declaration that Hungary had failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 63 TFEU and Articles 7, 8 and 12 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.