I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-627/11) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Request for a preliminary ruling - Manifest inadmissibility)
2013/C 108/09
Language of the case: Romanian
Applicant: SC ‘AUGUSTUS’ Iași SRL
Defendant: Agenția de Plăți pentru Dezvoltare Rurală și Pescuit
Request for a preliminary ruling — Inalta Curte de Casație și Justiție — Interpretation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1268/1999 of 21 June 1999 on Community support for pre-accession measures for agriculture and rural development in the applicant countries of central and eastern Europe in the pre-accession period (OJ 1999 L 161, p. 87) and Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds (OJ 1999 L 161, p. 1) — Cancellation and recovery, in the event of improper conduct, of Community funding granted under the SAPARD programme — Eligibility of expenditure — Cases of force majeure — Justification — Notions of ‘economic efficiency’ and ‘profitability’
The reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Inalta Curte de Casație și Justiție — Secția de contencios administrativ și fiscal (Romania), by decision of 3 November 2011, is manifestly inadmissible.
Language of the case: Romanian.
* * *
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 65, 3.3.2012.