EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-143/23: Order of the General Court of 15 December 2023 — Fugro v Council (Action for annulment — Taxation — Combating of tax avoidance — Directive (EU) 2022/2523 — Global minimum level of taxation for multinational enterprise groups and large-scale domestic groups in the Union — International shipping income exclusion — Challenge to the scope of that exclusion — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TB0143

62023TB0143

December 15, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2024/1865

11.3.2024

(Case T-143/23) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Action for annulment - Taxation - Combating of tax avoidance - Directive (EU) 2022/2523 - Global minimum level of taxation for multinational enterprise groups and large-scale domestic groups in the Union - International shipping income exclusion - Challenge to the scope of that exclusion - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(C/2024/1865)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Fugro NV (Leidschendam, Netherlands) (represented by: C. Docclo, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: K. Pavlaki, E. d’Ursel and G. Rugge, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the partial annulment of Council Directive (EU) 2022/2523 of 14 December 2022 on ensuring a global minimum level of taxation for multinational enterprise groups and large-scale domestic groups in the Union (OJ 2022 L 328, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene submitted by the Kingdom of the Netherlands, by the European Commission, by Koninklijke Boskalis BV and Boskalis Offshore Transport Services NV, by Heerema Offshore Energy Solutions BV, by Van Oord NV and Vox Amalia SL and by Koninklijke Vereniging van Nederlandse Reders.

3.Fugro NV shall bear its own costs and pay those of the Council of the European Union, with the exception of those relating to the applications to intervene.

4.Fugro, the Council and the applicants for leave to intervene referred to in point 2 of this operative part shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.

Language of the case: English.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1865/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

*

*1 Language of the case: English.

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia