- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-128/23, Müller Reisen: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 3 March 2023 — Müller Reisen GmbH v Stadt Olsberg
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0128
62023CN0128
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
15.5.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 173/23
(Case C-128/23, Müller Reisen)
(2023/C 173/32)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant and appellant: Müller Reisen GmbH
Defendant and respondent: Stadt Olsberg
Other party: Tuschen Transporte
Question referred
Having regard to Article 14 TFEU, must Article 32(2)(c) of Directive 2014/24/EU (1) be interpreted restrictively as meaning that, in cases of extreme urgency, a public service contract for services of general interest may be awarded by competitive procedures with negotiation without prior publication even in the case where the event is foreseeable by the contracting authority and the circumstances invoked to justify extreme urgency are attributable to that contracting authority?
(1) Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65).