I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-491/22) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for an EU figurative mark representing a smiley wearing a top hat - Earlier EU figurative mark representing a fantasy figure - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2023/C 189/41)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Zitro International Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Canela Giménez, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova and D. Gája, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: e-gaming s. r. o. (Prague, Czech Republic)
By its action brought under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 30 May 2022 (Case R 2005/2021-4).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Zitro International Sàrl to bear its own costs;
3.Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English
(1) OJ C 380, 3.10.2022.