- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-103/06: Judgment of the General Court of 13 April 2010 — Esotrade v OHIM — Segura Sánchez (YoKaNa) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark YoKaNa — Earlier Community and national figurative marks YOKONO — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62006TA0103
62006TA0103
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
5.6.2010
Official Journal of the European Union
C 148/26
(Case T-103/06)(1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark YoKaNa - Earlier Community and national figurative marks YOKONO - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2010/C 148/45
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Esotrade SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. de Rivera Lamo de Espinosa and J.E. Astiz Suárez, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. García Murillo and O. Montalto, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Antonio Segura Sánchez (Alicante, Spain)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 January 2006 (Case R 217/2004-2), concerning opposition proceedings between Antonio Segura Sánchez and Esotrade SA.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders the applicant to pay the costs.
OJ C 121, 20.5.2006.