EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-569/23, Toplofikatsia Sofia: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 14 September 2023 — ‘Toplofikatsia Sofia’ EAD v M. K. T., Ts. B. T., А. K. V.

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0569

62023CN0569

September 14, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2023/961

27.11.2023

(Case C-569/23, Toplofikatsia Sofia)

(C/2023/961)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: ‘Toplofikatsia Sofia’ EAD

Defendants: M. K. T., Ts. B. T., А. K. V.

Questions referred

1.Does Article 101(1) TFEU preclude national legislation, such as that applicable in the present case, under which a lawyer is obliged, on pain of disciplinary measures, to agree a fee that is not lower than the minimum amount provided for in the regulation, as regards each of the actions brought, irrespective of the form in which they are joined, and, if the client is not willing to pay such a fee in the light of the amount of the minimum fee in relation to the amount claimed or on grounds of financial difficulty, the only lawful possibility for the lawyer to conclude a contract with the client is to provide free legal assistance, in which case the court must determine and award to the lawyer a fee in respect of each action brought that may not be lower than the minimum amount laid down by the Vissh advokatski savet (Supreme Bar Council, Bulgaria), without it being possible to reduce that amount if the fee due is manifestly excessive?

2.Does Article 101(1) TFEU preclude national legislation, such as that applicable in the present case, under which, in the case of minimum lawyers’ fees laid down in a regulation by way of a decision of an association of undertakings, the Supreme Bar Council, which is mandatory for and binding on all lawyers, a lawyer may provide free legal assistance to a client whom he or she considers to be a person in financial difficulty, and the court is obliged, without being able to verify this, to award the lawyer a fee equal to the minimum amount laid down in the decision of the association of undertakings?

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/961/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia