I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Series C
(Case T-510/22) (*)
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark Tante Mitzi Caffè CAFFÈ — STRUDEL — BARETTO - Lack of genuine use of the mark - Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Facts relied on or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal - Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)
(C/2023/981)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Sastela, proizvodnja peciva in tort, d.o.o. (Ljutomer, Slovenia), (represented by: U. Pogačnik, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Nicolás Gómez, acting as Agent,)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Zenergo, svetovanje in druge storitve, d.o.o. (Zgornja Polskava, Slovenia), (represented by M. Maček, lawyer)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 June 2022 (Case R 1413/2021-2).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Sastela, proizvodnja peciva in tort, d.o.o. to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Zenergo, svetovanje in druge storitve, d.o.o.;
3.Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.
*
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/981/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)