I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
17.2.2025
(Action for annulment - Directive 2014/25/EU - Procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors - Request to establish that Directive 2014/25 does not apply to public procurement in the field of railway passenger transport in Sweden - Article 35(1) of Directive 2014/25 - Letter from the Commission requesting additional information - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/913)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: SJ AB (Stockholm, Sweden) (represented by: J. Karlsson and M. Johansson, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Wils, S. Baches Opi and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the purported decision of the European Commission contained in the letter sent by the latter to the former on 10 May 2023 requesting updated information from the applicant following the judgment of 1 February 2023, SJ v Commission (T-659/20, not published, EU:T:2023:32).
1.The action is dismissed.
2.SJ AB shall pay the costs.
—
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/913/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
*
* Language of the case: English.
* * *