- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-193/19: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Förvaltningsrätten i Malmö — Sweden) — A v Migrationsverket (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Border controls, asylum and immigration — Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement — Consultation of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the examination of an application for a residence permit made by a third-country national for whom an alert has been issued in the SIS for the purposes of refusing entry — Article 25(1) — Schengen Borders Code — Entry conditions for third-country nationals — Article 6(1) and (5) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 7 and Article 24(2) — Refusal to renew a residence permit for the purposes of family reunification on the ground that the applicant’s identity cannot be established with certainty)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0193
62019CA0193
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 163/3
(Case C-193/19) (1)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Border controls, asylum and immigration - Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement - Consultation of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the examination of an application for a residence permit made by a third-country national for whom an alert has been issued in the SIS for the purposes of refusing entry - Article 25(1) - Schengen Borders Code - Entry conditions for third-country nationals - Article 6(1) and (5) - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 7 and Article 24(2) - Refusal to renew a residence permit for the purposes of family reunification on the ground that the applicant’s identity cannot be established with certainty)
(2021/C 163/03)
Language of the case: Swedish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: A
Defendant: Migrationsverket
Operative part of the judgment
Article 25(1) of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders, signed in Schengen (Luxembourg) on 19 June 1990 and entering into force on 26 March 1995, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 265/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 March 2010, must be interpreted as not precluding legislation of a Member State which permits the issue, extension or renewal of a residence permit for the purposes of family reunification, requested from within the territory of that Member State by a third-country national who is the subject of an alert in the Schengen Information System for the purposes of refusing entry in the Schengen area and whose identity has not been able to be established by means of a valid travel document, only where the interests of the Member State which issued the alert and which has first been consulted have been taken into account and where the residence permit is issued, extended or renewed only for ‘substantive reasons’ within the meaning of that provision;
Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) and, in particular, Article 6(1)(a) thereof, must be interpreted as meaning that it does not apply to a third-country national who is in such a situation.
(1) OJ C 155, 6.5.2019.