I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-101/07)(<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for a figurative Community trade mark DADA - Earlier national word mark DADA - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Genuine use of the earlier trade mark - Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
(2009/C 32/56)
Language of the case: Italian
Applicant: Dada SpA (Florence, Italy) (represented by: D. Caneva and G. Locurto, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Sempio, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Dada Srl (Udine, Italy) (represented by: M. Cartella and M. Fazzini, lawyers)
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 January 2007 (Case R 1342/2005-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Dada Srl and Dada SpA.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Dada SpA to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 129, 9.6.2007.
ECLI:EU:C:2009:32