- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-1127/23: Action brought on 1 December 2023 — Butzkies-Schiemann v EUIPO — U.S. Corrosion Technologies (CorrosionX)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN1127
62023TN1127
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
Series C
C/2024/967
29.1.2024
(Case T-1127/23)
(C/2024/967)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Sven Butzkies-Schiemann (Büdelsdorf, Germany) (represented by: C. Drzymalla, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: U.S. Corrosion Technologies LLC (Garland, Texas, United States)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark CorrosionX — European Union trade mark No 14 304 349
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 September 2023 in Case R 1795/2022-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—to annul the contested decision;
—to order the defendant and the other Party to pay the costs incurred by the applicant.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 24(1) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;
—Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/967/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)