EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-17/13: Action brought on 11 January 2013 — ANKO v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TN0017

62013TN0017

January 11, 2013
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

16.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/24

(Case T-17/13)

2013/C 79/43

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: ANKO AE Antiprosopion, Emporiou kai Viomikhanias (Athens, Greece) (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

declare that the applicant is under no obligation to repay as unduly paid the sum which the Commission paid to it in respect of the POCEMON project;

declare that the applicant is under no obligation to pay to the Commission liquidated damages in respect of the POCEMON project;

declare that the Commission is not entitled to offset the amount which it is obliged to pay to ANKO, and

order the Commission to pay the applicant’s costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

This action relates to the liability of the Commission under grant agreement No 216088 for the carrying out of the project ‘Point Of CarE MONitoring and Diagnostics for Autoimmune Diseases’ (POCEMON), pursuant to Article 272 TFEU. In particular, the applicant maintains that although it performed its contractual obligations the Commission, contrary to the terms of the abovementioned agreement, the principle of good faith, the prohibition of abuse of rights and proportionality, sought the repayment of sums paid to ΑΝΚΟ. Further, the Commission carried out an offsetting of claims which were not certain, of a fixed amount and due.

For those reasons, the applicant maintains: first, that it is under no obligation to repay as unduly paid the whole of the sum which the Commission paid to it in respect of the POCEMON project; secondly, it is under no obligation to pay to the Commission liquidated damages in respect of the POCEMON project, and thirdly that the Commission is not entitled to offset against sums which it is obliged to pay to the applicant sums which are not certain, of a fixed amount and due.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia