I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-339/17) (*)
((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark SEVENOAK - Earlier international figurative mark 7seven - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))
(2019/C 35/26)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Shenzhen Jiayz Photo Industrial Ltd (Shenzhen, China) (represented by: M. de Arpe Tejero, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Seven SpA (Leinì, Italy) (represented by: L. Trevisan, lawyer)
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 March 2017 (Case R 1326/2016-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Seven and Shenzhen Jiayz Photo Industrial.
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 23 March 2017 (Case R 1326/2016-1);
2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
3.Orders EUIPO to bear, in addition to its own costs, eight tenths of the costs incurred by Shenzhen Jiayz Photo Industrial Ltd;
4.Orders Seven SpA to bear, in addition to its own costs, a tenth of the costs incurred by Shenzhen Jiayz Photo Industrial;
5.Orders Shenzhen Jiayz Photo Industrial to bear a tenth of its own costs.
(*) Language of the case: English.