- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-93/21: Action brought on 13 February 2021 — Creaticon v EUIPO — Paul Hartmann (SK SKINTEGRA THE RARE MOLECULE)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0093
62021TN0093
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.4.2021
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 138/46
(Case T-93/21)
(2021/C 138/62)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Creaticon d.o.o. (Zagreb, Croatia) (represented by: P. Krmpotić, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Paul Hartmann AG (Heidenheim, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark SK SKINTEGRA THE RARE MOLECULE — International registration designating the European Union No 1 424 199
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 December 2020 in Case R 847/2020-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—allow the trade mark registration No 1 424 199 for the relevant products in Class 3;
—alternatively, annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to reimburse the applicant’s costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of the principles of equal treatment and legal certainty.