- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-31/13 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber Chamber) of 13 February 2014 — Hungary v European Commission, Slovak Republic (Appeal — Protected geographical indications — Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 — Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications for wine — E-Bacchus database — Tokaj)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013CA0031
62013CA0031
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.3.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 93/17
(Case C-31/13 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - Protected geographical indications - Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 - Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications for wine - E-Bacchus database - Tokaj)
2014/C 93/26
Language of the case: Hungarian
Parties
Appellant: Hungary (represented by: M.Z. Fehér and K. Szíjjártó, Agents)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka, B. Schima and B. Eggers, Agents), Slovak Republic (represented by B. Ricziová, Agent)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 November 2012 in Case T-194/10 Hungary v Commission, in which the General Court dismissed as inadmissible an application for cancellation of the entry of the protected designation of origin ‘Vinohradnícka oblast’ Tokaj’, with Slovakia indicated as country of origin, in the electronic register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications for wine (E-Bacchus database) — Legal effects of an entry in the E-Bacchus database — Obligation to state reasons — Principles of sound administration, sincere cooperation and legal certainty.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Hungary to pay the costs;
3.Orders the Slovak Republic to bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 71, 9.3.2013.