- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-38/22: Judgment of the General Court of 1 March 2023 — Romedor Pharma v EUIPO — Perfect Care Distribution (CERVIRON perfect care) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — European Union figurative mark CERVIRON perfect care — Earlier unregistered national trade mark CERVIRON — Relative ground for invalidity — Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0038
62022TA0038
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 134/13
(Case T-38/22) (*)
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - European Union figurative mark CERVIRON perfect care - Earlier unregistered national trade mark CERVIRON - Relative ground for invalidity - Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2023/C 134/17)
Language of the case: Romanian
Parties
Applicant: Romedor Pharma SRL (Focşani, Romania) (represented by: E.-M. Dicu, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: R. Manea and E. Markakis, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Perfect Care Distribution SRL (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: R. Pop, lawyer)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 November 2021 (Case R 521/2021-2).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Romedor Pharma SRL to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO);
3.Orders Perfect Care Distribution SRL to bear its own costs.
(*)
Language of the case: Romanian
(1) OJ C 138, 28.3.2022.