EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-364/10: Judgment of the General Court of 16 September 2013 — Duravit and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Bathroom fittings and fixtures markets of Belgium, Germany, France, Italy the Netherlands and Austria — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Coordination of price increases and exchange of sensitive business information — Single and continuous infringement — Burden of proof — Fines — Equal treatment — Proportionality — Principle that penalties must have a proper legal basis)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TA0364

62010TA0364

September 16, 2013
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

9.11.2013

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/23

(Case T-364/10) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Bathroom fittings and fixtures markets of Belgium, Germany, France, Italy the Netherlands and Austria - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Coordination of price increases and exchange of sensitive business information - Single and continuous infringement - Burden of proof - Fines - Equal treatment - Proportionality - Principle that penalties must have a proper legal basis)

2013/C 325/38

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Duravit AG (Hornberg, Germany); Duravit SA (Bischwiller, France); and Duravit BeLux SPRL/BVBA (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: R. Bechtold, U. Soltész and C. von Köckritz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and A. Antoniadis, Agents, assisted by P. Thyri, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Simm and F. Florindo Gijón, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2010) 4185 final of 23 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39.092 — Bathroom Fittings and Fixtures) and for reduction of the fine imposed on the applicants in that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Annuls point (8) of Article 1(1) of Commission Decision C(2010) 4185 final of 23 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39.092 — Bathroom Fittings and Fixtures) in so far as the European Commission finds that Duravit AG, Duravit BeLux SPRL/BVBA and Duravit SA participated in an infringement in Italy, Austria and the Netherlands;

2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

3.Orders Duravit AG, Duravit BeLux and Duravit SA to bear three quarters of their own costs;

4.Orders the Commission to pay one quarter of the costs incurred by Duravit AG, Duravit BeLux and Duravit SA and to bear its own costs;

5.Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 288, 23.10.2010.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia