I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(C/2025/3632)
Language of the case: Dutch
Appellant: Minister van Asiel en Migratie
Respondent: UB
Must Article 17(2) of Directive 2001/55/EC (2) … be interpreted as conferring on Member States the power to suspend the examination of an application for international protection of a person enjoying temporary protection, during the period of temporary protection?
Must the decision time limits in Article 31 of Directive 2013/32/EU (3) … be interpreted as meaning that, where an application for international protection was made before or during the period of temporary protection by a beneficiary of Directive 2001/55/EC, those time limits only start running or only resume running at the end of the period of temporary protection?
—
(1) The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.
(2) Council Directive 2001/55/EC of 20 July 2001 on minimum standards for giving temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons and on measures promoting a balance of efforts between Member States in receiving such persons and bearing the consequences thereof (OJ 2001 L 212, p. 12).
(3) Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 60).
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3632/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—