I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for a Community figurative mark Neurim PHARMACEUTICALS - Earlier Community and national word marks EURIM-PHARM - Language of appeal proceedings - Time-limits - Admissibility of an appeal to the Board of Appeal - Principle of proportionality - Continuation of proceedings - Restitutio in integrum - Articles 59, 78 and 78a of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Rule 48(1)(c) and (2), Rule 49(1) and Rule 96(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd (Tel Aviv, Israel) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Eurim-Pharm Arzneimittel GmbH (Piding, Germany) (represented by: T. Raab, lawyer)
ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 June 2006 (Case R 74/2006-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Eurim-Pharm Arzneimittel GmbH and Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd to pay the costs.
* * *
(1) OJ C 237, 30.9.2006.