I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2016/C 392/65)
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian
Applicant: Iame SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: M. Mostardini, G. Galimberti, F. Mellucci and R. Kakkar, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Industrie Aeronautiche Reggiane Srl (Reggio Emilia, Italy)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word element ‘Parilla’ — European Union trade mark No 3 065 182
Procedure before EUIPO: Revocation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 June 2016 in Case R 608/2015-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision, on the ground of infringement of Article 51 of Regulation No 207/2009, in so far as that decision dismissed action R 608/2015-1 and confirmed the revocation for non-use of EU figurative mark No 3065182 ‘Parilla’, of which IAME S.p.A. is the proprietor, in respect of all the goods and services claimed in Classes 7 and 41;
and, accordingly:
—dismiss the application for revocation under Article 51 of Regulation No 207/2009 of EU figurative mark No 3065182 ‘Parilla’, of which IAME S.p.A. is the proprietor, in respect of all the goods and services claimed in Classes 7 and 41;
—reserve all rights to submit further pleas in law and evidence within the time-limits prescribed;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement and misapplication of Article 51 of Regulation No 207/2009.