- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-208/20: Action brought on 9 April 2020 — JH v Europol
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0208
62020TN0208
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 191/38
(Case T-208/20)
(2020/C 191/52)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: JH (represented by: M. Quaas, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare that the order adopted on 2 April 2019 by the defendant’s head official discharging the applicant with immediate effect from leadership of the organisational unit GDPT (Personal Protection) of the Governance Directorate of the European Police Office (Europol) was unlawful; and
—order the defendant to pay the applicant such compensation as the Court may deem appropriate.
Pleas in law and main arguments
The action is based on the following pleas in law:
1.Infringement of the Europol Staff Regulations
The applicant claims that the preconditions for the contested disciplinary measure under the Europol Staff Regulations have not been met. The defendant has disregarded the applicable provisions of the Staff Regulations and attempts to justify the adopted disciplinary measure (only) months later through a retroactive redeployment order and by reference to a reorganisation.
2.Injury to health and incapacity for work
Furthermore, the applicant seeks compensation because his health has demonstrably been harmed as a result of the unlawful measure and his further professional activity has therefore become impossible.