I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2015/C 320/75)
Language of the case: French
Applicants: ZZ and ZZ (represented by: N. de Montigny and J.N. Louis, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision to limit to five years the period of retroactive recalculation of the flat-rate allowance for overtime to which the applicants are entitled.
The applicants claim that the Tribunal should:
—annul the decision of 16 September 2014 of PMO. 1 to limit the payment of the adaptation of the flat-rate allowance for overtime to which the applicants have been entitled since 1 March 2007 and 1 March 2008 respectively, to five years from 1 September 2008, the date on which the PMO discovered the error in the calculation of their remuneration;
—order the Commission to pay the applicants the adaptation of the flat-rate allowance for overtime from 1 March 2007 and 1 March 2008 respectively, subject to the deduction of the sums already paid and together with default interest on the arrears of that allowance calculated from their deadline for payment until their actual payment at the rate fixed by the European Central Bank for its main refinancing operations increased by two points;
—order the Commission to pay the costs.