- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-486/08: Action brought on 14 November 2008 — Earle Beauty v OHIM (SUPERSKIN)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TN0486
62008TN0486
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
10.1.2009
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 6/41
(Case T-486/08)
(2009/C 6/80)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant(s): Liz Earle Beauty Co. Ltd (formerly Liz Earle Cosmetics Ltd.) (Ryde, United Kingdom) (represented by M. Cover, solicitor)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
—Annul the Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 September 2008 in case R 1656/2007-4 and declare that the Community trade mark concerned (application No 5 967 856) proceed to application and registration; and
—Order OHIM to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘SUPERSKIN’ for goods and services in classes 3, 5 and 44 — application No 5 967 856
Decision of the examiner: Rejection of the application
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the Board of Appeal erred in its finding that the trade mark concerned is descriptive of the characteristics of the goods or services for which registration is sought.