I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
((Application for interim measures - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents held by the EMA concerning information submitted by an undertaking as part of its application for authorisation to place a medicinal product on the market - Order granting suspension of operation of the decision to grant a third party access to the documents - Application for cancellation - No change in circumstances - Article 159 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court))
(2016/C 260/49)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Pari Pharma GmbH (Starnberg, Germany) (represented by: M. Epping and W. Rehmann, lawyers)
Defendant: European Medicines Agency (represented by: T. Jabłoński, N. Rampal Olmedo, A. Spina, A. Rusanov and S. Marino, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: Novartis Europharm Ltd (Camberley, United Kingdom) (represented by: C. Schoonderbeek, lawyer)
Application based on Article 159 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court seeking the cancellation of the order of 1 September 2015 in Pari Pharma v EMA (T-235/15 R, EU:T:2015:587), by which it granted the suspension of operation of Decision EMA/271043/2015 of the EMA of 24 April 2015, granting to a third party, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43), access to certain documents containing information submitted in the context of an application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Vantobra.
1.The request seeking the cancellation of the order of 1 September 2015 in Pari Pharma v EMA (T-235/15 R, EU:T:2015:587) is rejected.
2.The costs are reserved.