I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Series C
18.3.2024
(Case T-650/22) (*)
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark ATHLET - Absolute ground for invalidity - Bad faith - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(C/2024/2022)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Athlet Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Reinhard, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Heuver Banden Groothandel BV (Den Ham Ov, Netherlands) (represented by: R. Kunze, F. Tyra and E. Beer, lawyers)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 8 August 2022 (Case R 2214 /2019-1).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Athlet Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay Heuver Banden Groothandel BV’s costs;
3.Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs.
*
Language of the case: German.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2022/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)