- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-560/14: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court (Ireland) made on 5 December 2014 — MM v Minister for Justice and Equality, Ireland and the Attorney General
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014CN0560
62014CN0560
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
9.3.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 81/5
(Case C-560/14)
(2015/C 081/06)
Language of the case: English
Referring court
Supreme Court, Ireland
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: MM
Defendant: Minister for Justice and Equality, Ireland and the Attorney General
Question referred
1.Does the ‘right to be heard’ in European Union law require that an applicant for subsidiary protection, made pursuant to Council Directive 2004/83/EC (1), be accorded an oral hearing of that application, including the right to call or cross-examine witnesses, when the application is made in circumstances where the Member State concerned operates two separate procedures, one after the other, for examining applications for refugee status and applications for subsidiary protection, respectively?
(1) Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted, OJ L 304, p. 12.