I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Joined Cases C-536/08 and C-539/08) (*)
(Sixth VAT Directive - Article 17(2) and (3) - Article 28b(A)(2) - Right to deduction - Transitional arrangements for the taxation of trade between Member States - Place of the intra-Community acquisitions of goods)
(2010/C 161/13)
Language of the case: Dutch
Applicant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën
Defendants: X (C-536/08), fiscale eenheid Facet BV/Facet Trading BV (C-539/08)
References for a preliminary ruling — Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Den Haag) — Interpretation of Article 17(2) and (3) and Article 28b(A)(2) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Transitional arrangements for the taxation of trade between Member States — Place of intra-Community acquisitions of goods
Articles 17(2) and (3) and 28b(A)(2) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 92/111/EEC of 14 December 1992, must be interpreted as meaning that a taxable person coming within the situation referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 28b(A)(2) does not have the right immediately to deduct the input value added tax charged on an intra-Community acquisition.
(*) Language of the case: Dutch.
ECLI:EU:C:2010:140