- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-70/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland) lodged on 17 February 2015 — Emmanuel Lebek v Janusz Domino
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015CN0070
62015CN0070
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
26.5.2015
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 171/13
(Case C-70/15)
(2015/C 171/15)
Language of the case: Polish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Emmanuel Lebek
Respondent: Janusz Domino
Questions referred
1.Must Article 34(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters be interpreted as meaning that the possibility of commencing proceedings to challenge a judgment laid down therein covers both the situation in which such a challenge can be brought within the time-limit laid down in national law and the situation in which that time-limit has already passed but it is possible to submit an application for relief from the effects of its passing and then — following the grant of such relief — actually to commence such proceedings?
2.Must Article 19(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (service of documents), and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000 be interpreted as excluding the application of provisions of national law concerning the possibility of relief from the effects of the expiry of the time for appeal or as meaning that the defendant has the choice of availing himself of either the application for relief provided for in that provision or the relevant set of provisions under national law?
Language of the case: Polish
(1) OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1.
(2) OJ 2007 L 324, p. 79.