- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-366/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 December 2022 — Maxime Picard v European Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Members of the contract staff — Pension — Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — 2014 reform — Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 — Annex XIII to those regulations — Second paragraph of Article 21 and second subparagraph of Article 22(1) — Transitional measures relating to the annual rate of accrual of pension rights and retirement age — Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union — Annex — Article 1(1) — Application of those transitional measures by analogy to other staff employed on 31 December 2013 — Signature of new contract as a member of the contract staff — Act adversely affecting an official — Effective judicial protection)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0366
62021CA0366
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 54/12
(Case C-366/21 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Appeal - Civil service - Members of the contract staff - Pension - Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union - 2014 reform - Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 - Annex XIII to those regulations - Second paragraph of Article 21 and second subparagraph of Article 22(1) - Transitional measures relating to the annual rate of accrual of pension rights and retirement age - Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union - Annex - Article 1(1) - Application of those transitional measures by analogy to other staff employed on 31 December 2013 - Signature of new contract as a member of the contract staff - Act adversely affecting an official - Effective judicial protection)
(2023/C 54/13)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: Maxime Picard (represented by: S. Orlandi, avocat)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara and B. Mongin, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2021, Picard v Commission (T-769/16, EU:T:2021:153), as rectified by the order of 16 April 2021, Picard v Commission (T-769/16, EU:T:2021:200).
2.Annuls the reply of 4 January 2016 of the manager of the Pensions Sector of the European Commission’s Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) and the decision of 25 July 2016 of the Director of Directorate E of the Commission’s Directorate-General for Human Resources and Security dismissing the complaint of 4 April 2016 lodged by Mr Maxime Picard against that reply.
3.Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Mr Maxime Picard in the present appeal and at first instance.
* * *
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 357, 6.9.2021.
ECLI:EU:C:2023:140