EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-10/11 P: Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2011 — Birkhoff v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Family allowances — Dependent child allowance — Child suffering from an infirmity preventing her from earning a livelihood — Refusal to extend payment of the allowance)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TA0010

62011TA0010

November 29, 2011
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

28.1.2012

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/51

(Case T-10/11 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Family allowances - Dependent child allowance - Child suffering from an infirmity preventing her from earning a livelihood - Refusal to extend payment of the allowance)

(2012/C 25/98)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Gerhard Birkhoff (Weitnau, Germany) (represented by: C. Inzillo, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggars, acting as Agents, and by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 27 October 2010 in Case F-60/09 Birkhoff v Commission (not yet published in the ECR), seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 27 October 2010 in Case F-60/09 Birkhoff v Commission (not yet published in the ECR);

2.Refers the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal;

3.Orders that the costs be reserved.

(1) OJ C 55, 19.2.2011.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia