- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-258/04: Order of the Court of First Instance of 10 June 2009 — Poland v Commission (Action for annulment — Transitional measures to be adopted by reason of the accession of new Member States — Regulation (EC) No 60/2004 laying down transitional measures in the sugar sector — Time-limit for bringing action — Point from which time starts to run — Lateness — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62004TB0258
62004TB0258
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
15.8.2009
Official Journal of the European Union
C 193/21
(Case T-258/04)
(Action for annulment - Transitional measures to be adopted by reason of the accession of new Member States — Regulation (EC) No 60/2004 laying down transitional measures in the sugar sector - Time-limit for bringing action - Point from which time starts to run - Lateness — Inadmissibility)
2009/C 193/33
Language of the case: Polish
Parties
Applicant: Republic of Poland (represented by: J. Pietras and E. Ośniecka-Tamecka, initially, then T. Nowakowski and finally M. Dowgielewicz, Agents)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: L. Visaggio and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, initially, then T. van Rijn, L. Visaggio and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, Agents)
Intervener in support of the applicant: Republic of Cyprus (represented by: P. Kliridis, Agent)
Re:
Annulment of Articles 5, 6(1) to (3), 7(1) and 8(2)(a) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 60/2004 of 14 January 2004 laying down transitional measures in the sugar sector by reason of the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia (OJ 2004 L 9, p. 8)
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.The Republic of Poland is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those of the Commission.
3.The Republic of Cyprus is ordered to bear its own costs.
(1) OJ C 251, of 9.10.2004.