- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-356/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 27 July 2012 — Wolfgang Glatzel v Freistaat Bayern
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012CN0356
62012CN0356
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 9/25
(Case C-356/12)
2013/C 9/41
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Wolfgang Glatzel
Defendant: Freistaat Bayern
Question referred
Is point 6.4 of Annex III to Directive 2006/126/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on driving licences as amended by Commission Directive 2009/113/EC of 25 August 2009 compatible with Article 20, Article 21(1) and Article 26 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in so far as that provision requires — without permitting any derogation — that applicants for Category C1 and Category C1E driving licences have a minimum visual acuity of 0.1 in their worse eye even if those persons use both eyes together and have a normal field of vision when using both eyes?
Language of the case: German.
* * *
(1) OJ 2006 L 403, p. 18.
(2) OJ 2009 L 223, p. 31.