EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-390/16: Action brought on 22 July 2016 — Grupo Osborne v EUIPO — Ostermann (DONTORO dog friendship)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0390

62016TN0390

July 22, 2016
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/15

(Case T-390/16)

(2016/C 364/11)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Grupo Osborne, SA (El Puerto de Santa María, Spain) (represented by: J. Iglesias Monravá, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Daniel Ostermann (Leipzig, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Figurative mark containing the word elements ‘DONTORO dog friendship’ — EU trade mark application No 11 112 381

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 April 2016 in Case R 2002/2015-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision granting the European Union Trademark No 11 112 381‘DONTORO dog friendship’ (fig.) in Cls. 18, 20 and 35;

refuse the registration of the European Union Trademark No 11 112 381‘DONTORO dog friendship’ (fig.) in Cl. 35 in the ‘wholesale and retail sale services also through the Internet, garments, shoes and textile products’ and therefore refuse its registration in Classes 25 and 35 in the mentioned services;

order to whoever opposes this appeal to pay the court’s costs.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia