24.10.2022

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/43

(Case T-565/22)

(2022/C 408/57)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: HF (represented by: A. Tymen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—declare the present action admissible and well-founded;

and consequently,

—annul the decision of 3 November 2021 rejecting the applicant’s request for assistance of 11 December 2014;

—in so far as necessary, annul the decision of 3 June 2022, received on 7 June 2022, rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 3 February 2022;

—order the defendant to pay damages, fixed ex aequo et bono at EUR 50 000, as compensation for the non-material damage suffered by the applicant;

—order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging irregularity in the procedure followed by the Committee, infringement of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and infringement of Article 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union (‘the Staff Regulations’).

2.Second plea in law, alleging errors of assessment, breach of the duty to provide assistance and infringement of Articles 12a and 24 of the Staff Regulations.