EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-12/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 June 2013 — Di Prospero v Commission (Civil Service — Appointment — Success in a competition following a request to the applicant to sit the competition with a view to complying with a judgment — Appointment in the grade with retroactive effect)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012FA0012

62012FA0012

June 26, 2013
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

31.8.2013

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/45

(Case F-12/12) (<span class="super">1</span>)

(Civil Service - Appointment - Success in a competition following a request to the applicant to sit the competition with a view to complying with a judgment - Appointment in the grade with retroactive effect)

2013/C 252/78

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Rita Di Prospero (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues, A. Blot and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, acting as Agents)

Re:

Civil Service — Action for annulment of the Commission’s implied decision rejecting the applicant’s request for classification at grade AD 11 with retroactive effect as at 1 January 2010 and for compensation for damage allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1.The decision of the European Commission of 18 October 2011 refusing to grade Ms Di Prospero in grade AD 11 with retroactive effect from 1 January 2010 is annulled;

2.The remainder of the action is dismissed;

3.The European Commission shall bear its own costs and shall pay those incurred by Ms Di Prospero.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 138, 12.5.2012, p. 32.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia