I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2013/C 141/46
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Selo Medical GmbH (Unternberg, Austria) (represented by: T. Schneider, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: biosyn Arzneimittel GmbH (Fellbach, Germany)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 January 2013 in Case R 2601/2011-4 and reject the opposition against the Community trade mark application;
—Order OHIM or the potential intervener to pay the costs pursuant to Article 87(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant
Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘SELOGYN’ for goods in Class 5 — Community trade mark application No 9 049 016
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: biosyn Arzneimittel GmbH
Mark or sign cited in opposition: the national word mark ‘SELESYN’ for goods and services in Classes 5, 29 and 44
Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld
Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009